This report takes stock of quantitative results from a significant part of our projects and programs.
Impact Report
Our projects are effective
Are our projects successful?
The Welthungerhilfe (WHH) Impact Report provides the answer: yes, and in many areas of impact, we have improved further in recent years.
We are committed to measuring the impact of our work and presenting it transparently. The Impact Report is our central source of evidence for this. Based on systematically collected data, it shows the results our programs achieve, where they are particularly effective, and where adjustments are needed.
What is WHH’s Impact Report?
The Impact Report shows what our work actually achieves and the conclusions we draw from it for our strategy. It is not simply a retrospective review, but an evidence-based foundation for future decisions.
The current Impact Report builds on our first report from 2022 and takes a significant step forward. It not only measures impact systematically using standardized indicators, but also explains how and why change happens. Drawing on data and insights from 188 projects in 30 countries between 2022 and 2024, the new Impact Report combines quantitative results with qualitative analysis, making impact clear, comparable, and actionable. These projects represent around one third of all our work during this period, providing a representative sample.
The Impact Report is therefore a strategic management tool. It links verifiable results with concrete commitments for the future. Its aim is to consistently translate existing evidence into effective action, in order to further advance the goal of Zero Hunger on a healthy planet.
Results: What does WHH’s work achieve?
The WHH Impact Report shows that almost all areas of impact have improved, based on a much stronger data foundation than in the first report from 2022. The full report provides detailed insights into each area of analysis. A brief overview of the key results is available here:
Improved food and nutrition security: The number of food-secure months for households increased from an average of 7.4 months to 9.1 months per year, representing a 23% improvement. Among women of reproductive age, the proportion achieving a minimally diverse diet increased from 13% to 40% – a relative increase of 217% compared with baseline levels.
Household access to at least basic drinking water services rose from 25% to 58%, corresponding to a 129% increase compared with baseline coverage.
79% of participants in Welthungerhilfe training interventions successfully completed their courses. 46% of Welthungerhilfe's "Skill Up!" program graduates have found employment or improved their employment situation in occupations related to their training within one year.
Gender equality and women's empowerment: Women able to influence community decision-making increased from 15% to 40%, representing a 165% rise compared to baseline levels.
Economic development: 56% of households reported an increase in cash income over the project period.
Data Basis and Methodology
The Impact Report is based on a systematic analysis of 188 completed projects from 2022 to 2024. In total, it incorporates 316 quantitative data sets and 79 qualitative assessments.
How we define impact
In the Impact Report, we explain how we understand and assess impact. In doing so, we move away from a purely linear model in which outputs, outcomes, and impact are seen as sequential stages in a results chain. In complex contexts such as combating hunger and poverty, change rarely occurs along clear, linear cause-and-effect pathways.
Our understanding of impact therefore places the question of causality at the center: which changes can plausibly be linked to an intervention, and how robust is that connection?
To address this, in 2024 we introduced new definitions of “outcomes” and “impact” in our publication “Defining Impact”:
- Outcomes are observable changes in people’s behavior, in the well-being of people and the environment, and in the structures and practices of systems. They are considered outcomes if there is a plausible link to an intervention, based on experience, existing evidence, or theoretical reasoning. Outcomes can be intended or unintended, positive or negative.
- Impact refers to those outcomes that are relevant to people affected by hunger and poverty and for which the causal link to an intervention is supported by appropriate, context-specific evidence. The key consideration is not proof of isolated causation, but a clear and credible explanation of the contribution a measure has made to a given change.
Based on this understanding, WHH combines professional rigor with transparency: impact is not only measured, but also systematically substantiated and disclosed.
How we measure impact in our projects
The Impact Report does not view change as one-dimensional. Instead, impact is analyzed along four dimensions:
- Reach – How many people or systems are experiencing change?
- Magnitude – How significant is the change?
- Sustainability – How stable and long-lasting is it?
- Equity – How equitably is it distributed?
These four perspectives help interpret results in context and make visible what works, when, for whom, and why.
How we measure changes influenced by our projects
The backbone of Impact Report 2.0 is the 11 so-called Measuring Success indicators. They measure changes that can be directly influenced by WHH‘s work. These are not simply outputs of activities, such as the construction of a well, but outcomes—for example, people consuming clean drinking water and, as a result, experiencing fewer illnesses.
The Measuring Success indicators were selected in 2023 as part of a comprehensive revision of the monitoring system, with the aim of creating a standardized yet flexible framework that reflects WHH‘s dual role as a humanitarian and development actor.
The 11 Measuring Success indicators are:
- Months of Adequate Household Food Provisioning (MAHFP): The number of months per year during which a household had an adequate supply of food.
- FCS – Food Consumption Score: The proportion of households that have sufficient quantities and variety of food available.
- MDD-W – Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women: Proportion of women aged 15 to 49 with at least minimal dietary diversity (≥ 5 food groups).
- Access to at least basic drinking water service: Proportion of households with access to basic drinking water services.
- Access to at least basic sanitation services: Percentage of households with access to basic sanitation services.
- Increase in household cash income: Percentage of households that were able to increase their income during the project period.
- Graduates in relevant employment after training: Percentage of graduates who find employment or improve their employment situation after completing a WHH training program.
- Use of sustainable and resilient agriculture or land-management practices: Percentage of households that use sustainable and resilient agricultural or land-use practices.
- Use of climate adaptation / mitigation / preparedness measures: Percentage of households that use measures to adapt to and mitigate climate risks.
- Women’s participation in community decision-making: The proportion of women who actively participate in decision-making processes in their communities.
- Participant satisfaction with assistance received: The proportion of participants who are satisfied with the humanitarian assistance (in terms of relevance, quality, timeliness, and fairness).
Impact Report: Our projects drive sustainable change
Our Impact Report shows that combined interventions such as agricultural support, capacity strengthening, water, sanitation and hygiene services, and gender equality measures reinforce one another.
Our projects contribute to sustainable positive changes. However, these alone are not enough. To realize the right to food, we need long-term positive structural change. For this, we also need to further intensify our commitment to implementing rights-based projects.
Local communities and civil society need more space to be heard, and governments and the private sector require more support to optimize partnerships with civil society. To move closer to this goal, we aim to further improve our organization-wide knowledge of the impacts and changes we achieve.
In the wake of increasing conflict and climate shocks, we need to promote system-strengthening approaches to build resilience in food systems. One example is our global WASH program, which aims to sustainably improve water, sanitation and hygiene – in collaboration with civil society, government stakeholders and the private sector.
We are also taking a more holistic approach to food systems, which is the only way to make food access and use more sustainable, inclusive, and resilient.
WHH‘s impact measurement approach is continuously evolving. We are currently planning to expand the Impact Report into additional dynamic, digital formats and to publish regular updates.











